[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] docker storage setup
- From: Dusty Mabe <dustymabe gmail com>
- To: Andy Grimm <agrimm gmail com>
- Cc: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] docker storage setup
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:34:59 -0400
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 04:23:52PM -0400, Andy Grimm wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Dusty Mabe <dustymabe gmail com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:57:04PM -0400, Andy Grimm wrote:
> >> FWIW, I now have something somewhat package-able here:
> >> https://github.com/a13m/docker-storage-setup
> >>
> >> I have tested several cases with this code, and it seems to be working
> >> (as long as you use partx from
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149278 ... I dropped a
> >> patched version in /usr/local/sbin on my system for testing).
> >
> > So I hit this when KB initially put out a CentOS 7 image (see [1]). I asked
> > more questions but no one ever responded. Is this a problem in RHEL7 as well. Should
> > I open a bug there?
> >
> > [1] - https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2014-September/msg00004.html
> >
>
> Ahh, I wish I had been paying attention when you hit that originally.
> Would have saved me a little debugging time. :) Anyway, the bug I
> mentioned there *is* filed against RHEL 7. A patched version has
> already been built internally and is going through QA.
Oops. I assumed Fedora for some reason. Got it. Yeah I even did the leg work
for that one. I probably should have pressed it harder. I figured since
no one responded to the direct problem (including people that know things,
unlike me) then I must just be hitting something that might not be used (i.e.
if we were going to change our setup and not need multiple partitions for some
reason).
Either way, glad to see you tracked it down too.
Dusty
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]