[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] hosting dwalsh's docker repo (upstream + rh patches) on @projectatomic github
- From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
- To: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>, atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] hosting dwalsh's docker repo (upstream + rh patches) on @projectatomic github
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 06:17:29 -0400
On 08/13/2015 06:08 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015, at 04:39 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>> Dan Walsh maintains a few branches for docker which include upstream docker sources
>> + RH patches that are used by rpms for fedora, centos, rhel and their atomic
>> variants. The repo is: https://github.com/rhatdan/docker . Some current branches with
>> our patches are: rhel7-1.8, rhel7-1.9, fedora-1.8, fedora-1.9
> This has been in use for quite a while now - and I guess that's not likely to
> change anytime soon. Given that...having it be shared makes sense to me.
>
> I think it'd be a good idea to create a README.md describing why the branches
> exist. Maybe each branch has a master list of outstanding PRs along with any
> list of patches which are rejected upstream (are there any?)
I don't think so currently. I like the README.md
> Are the different branches rebased on any schedule, or just as needed? Is there
> anything right now monitoring upstream for commits that you use?
>
The latest branches following docker master update almost daily.
Basically merging in
docker changes. The Older branches 1.7, 1.8 should update very
infrequently, once
they settle down after a docker release.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]