I'll agree with Jeremy here, we should work on the container spec first and publishing second.
I'd be good with a Dockerfile and a guide how to run it as a starting point and that could be modified for each distribution to publish in their particular idiom
Brevity and typos result of tiny keyboard and giant thumbs
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karanbir Singh" <mail-lists karan org>
> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 5:08:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Tools container for Fedora and CentOS
> On 24/03/15 15:37, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks redhat com>
> >> To: "Lalatendu Mohanty" <lmohanty redhat com>
> >> Cc: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 11:29:40 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Tools container for Fedora and CentOS
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Lalatendu Mohanty" <lmohanty redhat com>
> >>> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 8:18:51 AM
> >>> Subject: [atomic-devel] Tools container for Fedora and CentOS
> >>> Hi,
> >>> What are our plans for including a similar docker SPC container as
> >>> rhel-tools for Fedora and CentOS? As discussed with some of you on
> >>> #atomic , it definitely doable for fedora and CentOS. However I am not
> >>> sure where we are with this.
> >> We should do it. Is there a Dockerfile publicly available?
> > We should definitely do it. I've already made my opinion known on that
> > internally ;)
> > Anyway I believe it's our plan to get this all out once the build tooling
> > is there in centos and fedora to build these "official-ish" images. In
> > the interim, I pushed this last year that's kinda sorta near rhel-tools
> > but has no support for the atomic command, the package list is slightly
> > different etc etc:
> > https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/jeremyeder/c7perf/dockerfile/
> > # docker pull jeremyeder/c7perf
> we can overload the /u/centos at index.docker.io for these sort of
> containers. maybe this doesnt merit a /_/centos instance
> would that work ?
Can you help me understand the distinction ? I don't know what the different URLs mean.
Ultimately my desire is that we end up with public tools images for fedora and centos, and my understanding is that Langdon will re-initiate that request internally.