[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Concerns about pushing Docker 1.10 into Fedora23
- From: Jason Brooks <jbrooks redhat com>
- To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Concerns about pushing Docker 1.10 into Fedora23
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:04:38 -0500 (EST)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Berkus" <jberkus redhat com>
> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 12:14:01 AM
> Subject: [atomic-devel] Concerns about pushing Docker 1.10 into Fedora23
>
> Folks,
>
> We were discussing the changes in Docker 1.10 at DevConf and became very
> concerned about the consequences of pushing it into Fedora23. I don't think
> that users will be prepared for the upgrade process for existing images.
> Basically, I can see two things happening to create some really unhappy
> users: (1) most of them ignore the update notice and then have a long outage
> when they restart Docker, or (2) some of them run the migrator, and for
> users with dozens of images it makes their system unresponsive until it's
> done. There's also a bunch of API changes, which *supposedly* don't break
> backwards compatibility, but has anyone tested for this?
>
> Is it worth considering holding 1.10 back until Fedora24?
F24 is set to release on June 7, docker makes a major release each
three months or so, and 1.9 is already three months old...
I don't think it's possible to fully shield users from the fast dev
pace of docker while keeping fedora reasonably up-to-date.
Docker just moves fast, we should kick our testing into a higher
gear to keep up.
Jason
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Project Atomic
> Red Hat
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]