On 01/06/2016 02:58 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 01/06/2016 02:26 PM, Micah Abbott wrote: >> A few weeks ago, we looked at bugs reported against Project Atomic components (atomic, docker, kubernetes, ostree, etc.) under the Fedora product category and it was noticed that the QA Contact for many of these components is 'extras-qa fedoraproject', which does not exist. This doesn't seem beneficial to the community and I think it could be changed to something more useful. (See this example - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295790) >> >> I'd like to have a mailing list similar to 'atomic-bugs redhat'. This is an internal mailing list that Red Hat employees can subscribe to and is used as the QA Contact for a number of the same components related to Project Atomic under the Red Hat product category. The benefit is that users can be notified about bugs that can affect the Project Atomic ecosystem without having to manually subscribe to individual bugs or components. (Example - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293357) >> >> >> I reached out to some folks in the Fedora Infrastructure group about this and recently received a response with potential solutions. >> >> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5037#comment:1 >> >> >> I'm not familiar enough with either solution, so I was hoping that the community could weigh in on what makes more sense. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Micah >> > I think you should choose option1. > Yeah, I want to create a pseudo user anyway to help track components. Will try to get this done this week. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb redhat com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature