Re: [atomic-devel] should /etc/os-release mention atomic?

[Charlie Drage <cdrage redhat com>]

This is an issue I've been tracking for a while now since it's
required in order to get docker-machine to work (it parses
/etc/os-release) with Atomic hosts

It's tracked here: https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/issue/6

and was previously tracked here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200122


On 07/28, Waldemar Augustyn wrote:
> It's a minor point but I wonder if /etc/os-release should mention atomic
> somewhere.  It's a different OS from centos/fedora listed now.  Right
> now I am checking rpm-ostree to tell atomic from standard centos/fedora.
> 

-- 

Charlie Drage
Red Hat - Dev Tools / Project Atomic
PGP - 4096R/C037D617
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xDA227403C037D617