[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Kubeadm vs. SELinux
- From: Clayton Coleman <ccoleman redhat com>
- To: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
- Cc: atomic-devel <atomic-devel projectatomic io>
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Kubeadm vs. SELinux
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:26:01 -0600
Probably trying to write to etc or var/lib.
> On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:38 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 11/22/2016 05:15 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Currently, it is not possible to run Kubeadm with SELinux enabled.
>>
>> This is bad; it means that Kubernetes' official installation
>> instructions include `setenforce 0`. But it's hard to argue the point
>> when a kubeadm install -- soon to be the main install option for
>> Kubernetes, and the only one which currently works on Atomic -- simply
>> doesn't work with SELinux enabled.
>>
>> The current blocker is that kubeadm init will hang forever at this stage:
>>
>> <master/apiclient> created API client, waiting for the control plane to
>> become ready
>>
>>
>> The errors shown in the journal are here:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/jberkus/4e926c76fbf772ffee4eb774cb0a4c60
>>
>> That's on Fedora 25 Atomic. I've had the exact same experience on
>> CentOS 7 and RHEL 7, although the error messages are not identical.
>>
>> Seems like this is on us to fix, if we want people to keep SELinux
>> enforcing. I don;t know if we need to push patches to Kubeadm, or to
>> SELinux, or both.
>>
>
> What AVC's are you seeing? Where is the bugzilla for this?
>
> ausearch -m avc -ts recent
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]