[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] systemd as pid 1 in an unprivileged container.
- From: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan redhat com>
- To: Tobias Florek <atomic ibotty net>
- Cc: Lukáš Nykrýn <lnykryn redhat com>, atomic-devel projectatomic io, Lennart Poettering <lennart poettering net>, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] systemd as pid 1 in an unprivileged container.
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:26:55 +0200
Hi,
Tobias Florek <atomic ibotty net> writes:
> now that systemd conference has been a success, I wanted to ask whether
> you had a chance to look into it?
I was playing around with bubblewrap and systemd. I've submitted some
patches for systemd that got merged:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/4280
they enable systemd to work without CAP_AUDIT[READ|WRITE] and not fail
when setgroups is disabled (can be done through /proc/PID/setgroups).
I have more patches to bubblewrap:
https://github.com/projectatomic/bubblewrap/pull/101
that are needed to run systemd in it. I think the overall design, and
that some caps are left only when in a new user namespace is safe.
Anyway, they require a very accurate review, as a bug there can open the
door to really bad things.
Regards,
Giuseppe
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]