Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host tree numbering is inconsistent

[Josh Berkus <jberkus redhat com>]

On 06/19/2017 11:20 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Josh Berkus <jberkus redhat com> wrote:
>> Jason, KB, etc.:
>>
>> This is the beginning of last month's announcement:
>>
>> An updated version of [CentOS Atomic
>> Host](https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download)
>> (tree version 7.20170428), is
>> now available ...
>>
>> And this is this month's:
>>
>> An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (tree version 7.1705), is now
>> available[1]. CentOS Atomic Host is a lean operating system designed to
>> run ...
>>
>> See the problem here?  How is a user supposed to keep track of upgrades?
> 
> We did change the versioning, I should have mentioned it in the message.
> 
> It's not inconsistent, though, in that both are date-based, the last
> indicates Apr 2017, this one indicates May 2017. We talked about this
> in our last SIG meeting -- the rest of centos revs monthly, with this
> same major-version.YYMM scheme, and we've switched to that scheme for
> CentOS Atomic.
> 
> Our images have actually carried this 1705, 1704, 1703 number for
> quite a while now, and this should make it easier for users to match
> up images with the version of the tree they contain.

OK.  Mind writing a para on this for the blog post?

-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Project Atomic
Red Hat OSAS