[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [atomic-devel] Breaking up our tools container image



Looks like it:

http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/09/introducing-the-fedora-tools-image-for-fedora-atomic-host/
https://hub.docker.com/r/centos/tools/



On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Josh Berkus <jberkus redhat com> wrote:
On 06/27/2017 02:01 PM, Ben Breard wrote:
> Today we ship a “tools” container that’s *really* large, specifically
> it’s about 1.5 GB on disk. The feedback I’ve gotten from users is that
> it's too large to be useful and they try to avoid it. This of course
> makes me sad and I think we should take another look at it. Primarily
> this container contains debugging, performance, support utilities
> (sosreport), as well as man pages for packages only shipped on Atomic
> Host. I think splitting it up along these lines makes sense and will be
> intuitive for users. That said, there’s a fine line between some of the
> debugging and performance tools, so after looking at the package list, I
> think it makes sense to keep those together in the “2.0” tools container.

Is this Tools container only used on RHEL, or is it used for
CentOS/Fedora as well?

--
--
Josh Berkus
Project Atomic
Red Hat OSAS



--

Ben Breard
Sr Technology Product Manager - Linux Containers
Mobile: 972-816-9081

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]