[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20171003
- From: Dusty Mabe <dusty dustymabe com>
- To: Josh Berkus <jberkus redhat com>, atomic-devel <atomic-devel projectatomic io>
- Cc: atomic lists fedoraproject org
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20171003
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:53:53 -0400
On 10/04/2017 12:35 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 04:11 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 10/03/2017 11:34 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>> Tomorrow we will attempt to release the 20171003 images.
>>> These images contain the following ostree version/commit:
>>>
>>> 26.141
>>> 541abd650d1ffb3929e2ba8114436a0b04ee41da76a691af669dd037589a1421
>>>
>>> The atomic host VM images are here:
>>>
>>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-26-20171003.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/
>>>
>>> The ISO image is here:
>>>
>>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-26-20171003.0/compose/Atomic/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-ostree-x86_64-26-20171003.0.iso
>>
>> Hardware test FAIL: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/345
>>
>
> BTW, I'm thinking I should pick up a less wonky small server for these
> HW tests; I never trust that the minnowboard behaves like a normal x86
> server.
One data point: Intel NUC works fine: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/345#comment-470350
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]