Re: [atomic-devel] fedora 28 atomic workstation

Great that you like it!

You can install Flatpaks via Gnome Software if you add the repo:

Additionally, you can package layer them, which you're probably familiar with from Atomic Host.

This should all be ironed out in the coming weeks and months, but if you need anything or something from the above needs more clarification, let me know or, ideally, post a thread in the Silverblue category on discussion.fedoraproject.org so others see it as well.

We will also improve the docs in several iterations. Feel free to add PRs to the docs as well, of course.

Cheers!

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, 15:46 arnaud gaboury, <arnaud gaboury gmail com> wrote:

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:30 PM Sanja Bonic <sanja redhat com> wrote:
We'll have to change that, I'll put that as a to do.

I do think it is a good idea to let the user know it is fedora-atomic.

A really huge thank-you for this new wonderful Fedora flavor. Atomic server is really hot, so long life to Atomic workstation, or Silverblue.

I take opportunity to say Gnome software window opens but don't show any package. I can see the various groups (game, video...) but no app at all are shown :-(

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Dusty Mabe <dusty dustymabe com> wrote:

On 07/23/2018 07:45 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I installed Fedora 28 atomic workstation from team silverblue website[0]. I already run atomic on my servers and wanted to see how looks the Silverblue project.
>
> After some partitioning issues (dual boot with w10) I now run the workstation. I have still a doubt as the rpm-ostree command output does not mentioned Atomic, neither /etc/os-release. I was waiting in the ostree the "Fedora Atomic" magic words.
> The filesystem is certainly the same as the one of my servers, rpm-ostree works, but I would like to be sure to run the correct Fedora flavor.
>
> --------------------------------
> $ rpm-ostree status
> State: idle; auto updates disabled
> Deployments:
> ● ostree://fedora-workstation:fedora/28/x86_64/workstation
>                    Version: 28.20180721.0 (2018-07-22 01:03:46)
>                 BaseCommit: 23ebd83520e7aa817030b1679cd91a4ff76ea39e283a018b18e898c226bf3d17
>               GPGSignature: Valid signature by 128CF232A9371991C8A65695E08E7E629DB62FB1
>            LayeredPackages: dnf fedora-workstation-repositories git nano vim zsh
>
> ostree://fedora-workstation:fedora/28/x86_64/workstation
>                    Version: 28.20180721.0 (2018-07-22 01:03:46)
>                 BaseCommit: 23ebd83520e7aa817030b1679cd91a4ff76ea39e283a018b18e898c226bf3d17
>               GPGSignature: Valid signature by 128CF232A9371991C8A65695E08E7E629DB62FB1
>            LayeredPackages: fedora-workstation-repositories git nano vim zsh
> -----------------------------------
>
> ----------------------------
> $ cat /etc/os-release
> os-release ostree/
> [root yogabx gabx]# cat /etc/os-release
> NAME=Fedora
> VERSION="28 (Workstation Edition)"
> ID=fedora
> VERSION_ID=28
> PLATFORM_ID="platform:f28"
> PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 28 (Workstation Edition)"
> ANSI_COLOR="0;34"
> CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:28"
> HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/"
> SUPPORT_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help"
> BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/"
> REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=28
> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=28
> PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy"
> VARIANT="Workstation Edition"
> VARIANT_ID=workstation
> -----------------------------------
>
> Can someone please confirm I am running Fedora Atomic Workstation.
> Thank you
>

Looks right to me. I don't know if anyone ever updated /etc/os-release for FAW
to say anything different than just the plain Fedora Workstation edition.

Dusty