[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic] Best practice for updating Atomic
- From: Josh berkus <josh agliodbs com>
- To: Giovanni Tirloni <gpt gtirloni com>
- Cc: atomic projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic] Best practice for updating Atomic
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:34:53 -0700
Odd, Jason?
On 05/31/2016 09:27 AM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Josh berkus <josh agliodbs com> wrote:
>> On 05/30/2016 07:52 PM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
>>> I'm getting started on Atomic and it looks really fascinating.
>>>
>>> I performed an installation of CentOS Atomic 7 (from 2016-04-04) but
>>> `rpm-ostree upgrade` couldn't find any updates.
>>
>> Hmmm, when did you last run it? We should have had a CentOS update
>> recently.
>
> # date
> Tue May 31 16:19:23 UTC 2016
>
> # cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core)
>
> # rpm-ostree upgrade
> Updating from: centos-atomic-host:centos-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard
> 1 metadata, 0 content objects fetched; 313 B transferred in 0 seconds
> No upgrade available.
>
> # atomic host upgrade
> Updating from: centos-atomic-host:centos-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard
> 1 metadata, 0 content objects fetched; 313 B transferred in 0 seconds
> No upgrade available.
>
> # rpm-ostree status
> TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME
> REFSPEC
> * 2016-04-04 21:25:34 7.20160404 e39c28570a
> centos-atomic-host
> centos-atomic-host:centos-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard
>
> GPG: Found 1 signature on the booted deployment (*):
>
> Signature made Mon 04 Apr 2016 09:33:10 PM UTC using RSA key ID
> F17E745691BA8335
> Good signature from "CentOS Atomic SIG <security centos org>"
>
> # cat /ostree/repo/config
> [core]
> repo_version=1
> mode=bare
>
> # rpm -q openssl
> openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.4.x86_64
>
> I understand the latest one should be openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.5.x86_64
> (https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2016-May/021860.html).
>
> I'm trying to understanding if rpm-ostree is the only way to get these
> updates or if there another option. Building our own updates here
> doesn't look too complicated but I wouldn't like to reinvent the wheel
> / duplicate work.
>
> If you need any other information and/or have pointers to some docs I
> should read, that'd be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Giovanni
>
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]