On 07/21/2014 10:16 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:59:27AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> On 07/21/2014 08:56 AM, Andy Grimm wrote: >>> This is techinically correct, but perhaps I can make it more clear. >>> Joe's response was that project atomic would not "own" any images >>> produced. Images *will* be produced by Fedora, and probably CentOS as >>> well (and some of the same people will probably be involved), but it >>> makes sense for the distros to own the image production process and >>> the resulting artifacts. >> >> And as we all know, "technically correct" is the best kind of correct... >> >> Yes - there will be images, but ATM the plan is they come from Fedora >> and CentOS, rather than a 'new' distro from Project Atomic. Part of the >> goodness of Project Atomic is that we're using packages that are already >> part of a major distro and well-tested. >> > > Ok, so I'll assume that the images are being "taken care of". It's something we're working on - however, we would not say no to help through those projects. We're currently meeting (today) about what's needed in Fedora infra to build + ship an Atomic release regularly, and we're also working through those problems in CentOS b/c Atomic isn't quite meshed with the normal build process. We'd love to have help - just it will be done through the distros. Does that make sense? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb redhat com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature