[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [atomic-devel] Are we slim yet?



On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161251

So for this one, do we even want git in the base image *at all*? I see
that the usecase that you mentioned in the bug was for downloading
Dockerfiles which are maintained in git. I don't see people (but maybe
I'm wrong) building images on an Atomic host, but rather using
something to download the finished images from either a private
registry or the Docker Hub, as applicable. Am I missing some other use
case here?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]