[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Are we slim yet?
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>
- To: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- Cc: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Are we slim yet?
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:53:47 -0500
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> I think we need to do two things:
> 1) Invest in shrinking down the core depchains (mainly, get Perl and Ruby out immediately)
> 2) Start performing some content postprocessing, like lorax does for Anaconda. I'd been resisting this for a while because:
> * It means we constantly have to maintain the postprocess scripts across releases; look at the churn in lorax templates
> * It potentially introduces new bugs
> * It doesn't help the mainline product (unlike #1)
> * It breaks rpm -V even more than it is now
> That said, I may look at using the lorax template tooling for 2).
Let's please avoid #2. It really cancels out all of the advantages of
the rpm-ostree approach. Fedora Base Design group is working on #1.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm mattdm org <http://mattdm.org/>
Fedora Project Leader mattdm fedoraproject org <http://fedoraproject.org/>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]