[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [atomic-devel] atomic push or atomic upload

On 07/29/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Anyone have thoughts on this?

Is this going to have identical behavior to "docker push" long-term or
is there any chance that it's going to diverge meaningfully from what
one would expect with `docker push`?

If we're giving ourselves room for the command to do things that would
be surprising / different from `docker push` then I'd stick with `atomic
upload` rather than `atomic push`. (We could also alias push to upload?)

I'm reluctant to rename things once they're in the wild, though the odds
that it's going to inconvenience a lot of users so soon is probably small.


Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb redhat com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]