[atomic-devel] docker binary

[Waldemar Augustyn <waldemar astyn com>]

I've been wondering about it.  Docker's docker is a single binary. 
RedHat's docker is a binary plus some dozen shared libraries.  I
certainly understand why a distro might do that.  But.... this is
Atomic: everything is a container .  It matters.  Host services such as
docker, systemctl, and a few others find their way to containers via
bind mounts.  It helps if the bind mounted binary does not try to link
against local libraries. Especially if they don't exist, or they do,
wrong version.

Is there a chance Atomic might build docker, systemctl, journalctl, etc.
as single binaries?  Or, at least reduce the number of dependencies.