[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Please add conntrack-tools
- From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
- To: jzb redhat com, "Erik Swanson (eriswans)" <eriswans cisco com>
- Cc: "atomic-devel projectatomic io" <atomic-devel projectatomic io>
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Please add conntrack-tools
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:10:36 -0400
On 07/27/2015 04:51 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 07/27/2015 04:48 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
>>>> On 07/27/2015 02:42 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
>>>>>> If there's some command already in the Atomic host that can do the equivalent of `conntrack -D ...`, I'd love to know about it. Otherwise, conntrack-tools should probably be added to the host, at least temporarily until Docker itself starts doing the right thing via direct system calls (or however they fix it).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (If this should be filed as a bug in a tracker somewhere, please let me know. I didn't see an obviously appropriate component for requesting package additions for Fedora Atomic in Bugzilla.)
>>>> Generally we'd add in the Fedora Cloud Trac:
>>>>
>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/
>>>>
>>>> We don't typically add tools for short-term debugging... is there a way
>>>> you could do this with a privileged container?
>> This is less a debugging thing and more something that needs to be executed every time a udp-publishing container is restarted.
>>
>> Having to do a `docker run` in an ExecStartPre feels wrong, but, it does work. Thanks.
> I'm not trying to completely rule out adding this, just want to make
> sure we explore all the angles. If anybody has thoughts on this, please
> speak up.
>
> Thanks!
>
> jzb
I would certainly think docker needs to fix this bug.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]