Re: [atomic-devel] Just added bash-completion for the atomic command, if

Colin,

Sorry for the late reply, was travelling. The process looks fine, but that repo was a sample of what we could do, not an official tracking repo for Project Atomic.

I think we were ready to go ahead and build the official repo, but I don't know where the process stalled. I'd expect someone other than me to run it right now, if only for someone more familiar with good merge pratices.

-Matt M

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:

Hi, thanks for posting this. I want to back up though - we really should have a process for changes like the new /usr/bin/atomic. Matt started a thread on this a while ago that was dropped, I just wrote up a proposal:

https://github.com/nzwulfin/oversight/pull/2

And here's the proposed patch:

diff --git a/fedora-atomic-docker-host.json b/fedora-atomic-docker-host.json
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@

"etc-group-members": ["wheel", "docker"],

- "packages": ["glibc", "nss-altfiles", "shadow-utils",
+ "packages": ["atomic",
+ "glibc", "nss-altfiles", "shadow-utils",
"fedora-release",
"dracut-config-generic", "kernel",
"dracut-network",

Matt, did I do the proposal process correctly?

In order to get the new package, this update still needs karma:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2878/rpm-ostree-2015.3-5.fc22,atomic-0-0.7.gita7ff4cb.fc22

Re: [atomic-devel] Just added bash-completion for the atomic command, if anyone wants to test.