[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] go1.4 requirement
- From: Tim St Clair <tstclair redhat com>
- To: Vincent Batts <vbatts redhat com>
- Cc: atomic-devel projectatomic io, Eric Paris <eparis redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] go1.4 requirement
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:28:53 -0400 (EDT)
We're going to have to eat the update at some point, is there a reason to hold off (other then churn)?
Cheers,
Tim
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vincent Batts" <vbatts redhat com>
> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io, "Eric Paris" <eparis redhat com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:50:13 PM
> Subject: [atomic-devel] go1.4 requirement
>
> I see that upstream etcd is now requiring go1.4
> https://github.com/coreos/etcd/issues/2524
>
> Docker has churned on this for a while, but I have staved them off since
> upgrading f20, f21 and epel6 to go1.4 would deprecate a few packages
> (bash completion, emacs and vim editor files, etc) and this is not
> something I care to push mid stream.
>
> The `net/http` BasicAuth is pretty small
> https://golang.org/src/net/http/request.go?s=16575:16641#L518
> and seems like it _could_ be easily backported, though there are other
> nice improvements to move forward to go1.4 for. And I'm not keen on
> backporting things where an upgrade of version would be easier...
>
> Thoughts?
> vb
>
--
Cheers,
Timothy St. Clair
Red Hat Inc.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]