[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Addition of socat to Atomic?
- From: Mrunal Patel <mpatel redhat com>
- To: Clayton Coleman <ccoleman redhat com>
- Cc: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Addition of socat to Atomic?
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
>
> This is being run by the Kubelet and is the "we need to hook container A to
> an incoming HTTPS SPDY stream for transport back to the edge". It would be
> really a dependency of the Kubelet, at least until we have a socat/nsenter
> equivalent that lets us direct enter a namespace and connect out.
It is on my plate to look into that. Hopefully will have something by next week.
Thanks,
Mrunal
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015, at 09:13 AM, Andy Goldstein wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > For OpenShift 3, we are currently using socat on the OpenShift nodes to
> > > enable port forwarding from a user’s machine to ports in containers.
> > > Would
> > > it be possible to add socat to Atomic?
> >
> > Did you investigate a toolbox container for this? With `--pid=host` and
> > `--net=host`, you can run a container with socat inside that starts with
> > the
> > host network stack. Then via a combination of `--pid=host` and `nsenter`,
> > you can access *other* container's network namespaces.
> >
> > It'd be even easier I think if `socat` directly learned about `setns()`,
> > similar to
> > https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2015-February/msg00064.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]