----- Original Message ----- > From: "Amanda Carter" <acarter redhat com> > To: "Michael McGrath" <mmcgrath redhat com> > Cc: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm redhat com>, atomic-devel projectatomic io, "Colin Walters" <walters redhat com>, "Dusty > Mabe" <dmabe redhat com>, "Adam Miller" <admiller redhat com> > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:22:41 AM > Subject: Re: Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael McGrath" <mmcgrath redhat com> > > To: "Amanda Carter" <acarter redhat com> > > Cc: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm redhat com>, atomic-devel projectatomic io, > > "Colin Walters" <walters redhat com>, "Dusty > > Mabe" <dmabe redhat com>, "Adam Miller" <admiller redhat com> > > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 5:17:40 PM > > Subject: Re: Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Amanda Carter <acarter redhat com> wrote: > > > Adding the list. Both questions still open. > > > > > > > IMHO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276775 is a blocker > > OK, any thoughts on how this should be gated going forward? Do we expect a > person to monitor this or do we need a mechanism for folks to Following up on this thread to let everyone know what we've worked out here. The first release for Atomic was not shipped due to this blocker. Going forward, Mike McGrath will be taking ownership of reviewing this backlog every 2 weeks to make sure someone is working blockers to resolution prior to our release window. Jen Krieger will be helping him to execute that. Adam has put a mechanism [1] in place to allow Mike to mark a release as bad if there are any blockers. I expect the process to look something like this... * A week before the 2 week release (next one is Dec 1), Jen schedules a review that Mike leads * If there are any blocker bugs in that review, Mike will mark the release as bad * Any blockers need to be patched and enter the release process (see attached very rough sketch of this process) at least 3 business days prior to our scheduled release * If blockers are resolved, Mike will unmark the release as bad * When the 2 week release script runs, it will check our automated testing status from AutoCloud *and* this manual flag before shipping anything * The flag will be reset after we attempt to release * And then we will profit... I hope we can run through this for the next release - kicking off the review on Tuesdayish. If you have any feedback or questions on this please call my secretary. Not really, lemme know. \o/ [1] https://pagure.io/mark-atomic-bad > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278984 not a blocker if > > it can be fixed by the next 2 week release. I'm willing to hear > > arguments on this one but I don't know that contacting docker from > > within a docker container is a common use case (I know openshift does > > this for builds but I don't think many are running openshift on atomic > > host today). > > > > -Mike > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: "Colin Walters" <walters redhat com> > > >> To: "Amanda Carter" <acarter redhat com> > > >> Cc: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm redhat com>, "Michael McGrath" > > >> <mmcgrath redhat com>, "Dusty Mabe" <dmabe redhat com>, > > >> "Adam Miller" <admiller redhat com> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:05:41 PM > > >> Subject: Re: Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers > > >> > > >> Can this discussion be in public at: > > >> > > >> https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/ > > >> > > >> ? > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > >> > Hey guys, Dusty has raised 2 bugs that he thinks should be considered > > >> > potential release blockers for the 2 week atomic release on Tuesday. > > >> > Could > > >> > you guys comment on these bugs and whether or not we should hold the > > >> > release > > >> > for them? Also, how should escalations for blockers outside of our > > >> > tests > > >> > / > > >> > script be escalated more generally? > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Amanda Carter > > >> > > > >> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276775 > > >> > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278984 > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Amanda Carter > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mike McGrath | mmcgrath redhat com | (312) 660-3547 > > Atomic | Red Hat Chicago | http://projectatomic.io/ > > > > -- > Amanda Carter > > -- Amanda Carter
Attachment:
bugfix_flow-1.png
Description: PNG image
