Re: [atomic-devel] Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers

[Michael McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com>]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Amanda Carter <acarter redhat com> wrote:
> Adding the list. Both questions still open.
>

IMHO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276775 is a blocker

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278984 not a blocker if
it can be fixed by the next 2 week release.  I'm willing to hear
arguments on this one but I don't know that contacting docker from
within a docker container is a common use case (I know openshift does
this for builds but I don't think many are running openshift on atomic
host today).

       -Mike

> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Colin Walters" <walters redhat com>
>> To: "Amanda Carter" <acarter redhat com>
>> Cc: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm redhat com>, "Michael McGrath" <mmcgrath redhat com>, "Dusty Mabe" <dmabe redhat com>,
>> "Adam Miller" <admiller redhat com>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:05:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers
>>
>> Can this discussion be in public at:
>>
>> https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/
>>
>> ?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > Hey guys, Dusty has raised 2 bugs that he thinks should be considered
>> > potential release blockers for the 2 week atomic release on Tuesday. Could
>> > you guys comment on these bugs and whether or not we should hold the
>> > release
>> > for them? Also, how should escalations for blockers outside of our tests /
>> > script be escalated more generally?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Amanda Carter
>> >
>> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276775
>> > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278984
>> >
>>
>
> --
> Amanda Carter
>



-- 
Mike McGrath | mmcgrath redhat com | (312) 660-3547
Atomic | Red Hat Chicago | http://projectatomic.io/