Re: [atomic-devel] [PATCH] Re: Fedora atomic host 23 and ansible

[Jason Brooks <jbrooks redhat com>]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Miller" <maxamillion fedoraproject org>
> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:26:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] [PATCH] Re: Fedora atomic host 23 and ansible
> 
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 04:05 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> >> Python 2 is explicitly installed, but the question is how far up the stack
> >> we go.
> >
> > Specifically a topical question is `python-docker-py` which is used
> > by the Ansible Docker module.
> >
> > Personally, I vote against adding this - anyone who wants to pull
> > Docker containers can just use `command: docker pull` relatively
> > easily, and in the big picture we want Kubernetes to handle things like
> > this.
> > Open to discussion though.
> >
> 
> I'd vote in favor of including the python-docker-py package for users
> of Atomic Host and the Ansbile docker module. There have been more
> than one instance I've been involved in where someone in IRC is
> reporting that "Ansible doesn't work on Atomic Host" because they were
> trying to use the docker module and their understanding was the docker
> was "the way" to do things in Atomic. While kubernetes is great, I'd
> prefer to offer the userbase more freedom to choose how they deploy
> and manage docker containers on an Atomic Host and Ansbile seems to be
> quite popular among the Atomic Host userbase (just in general, not
> specifically for docker deployments) so I don't think it's an
> unrealistic expectation that the Ansible docker module works out of
> the box.

+1 I'd rather err on the side of satisfying user expectations 


Jason

> 
> Just my opinion though, I'd be curious of others opinions on the topic as
> well.
> 
> -AdamM
> 
>