On 10/28/2015 02:44 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Adam Miller" <maxamillion fedoraproject org> >> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io >> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:26:28 AM >> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] [PATCH] Re: Fedora atomic host 23 and ansible >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 04:05 PM, Colin Walters wrote: >>> >>>> Python 2 is explicitly installed, but the question is how far up the stack >>>> we go. >>> >>> Specifically a topical question is `python-docker-py` which is used >>> by the Ansible Docker module. >>> >>> Personally, I vote against adding this - anyone who wants to pull >>> Docker containers can just use `command: docker pull` relatively >>> easily, and in the big picture we want Kubernetes to handle things like >>> this. >>> Open to discussion though. >>> >> >> I'd vote in favor of including the python-docker-py package for users >> of Atomic Host and the Ansbile docker module. There have been more >> than one instance I've been involved in where someone in IRC is >> reporting that "Ansible doesn't work on Atomic Host" because they were >> trying to use the docker module and their understanding was the docker >> was "the way" to do things in Atomic. While kubernetes is great, I'd >> prefer to offer the userbase more freedom to choose how they deploy >> and manage docker containers on an Atomic Host and Ansbile seems to be >> quite popular among the Atomic Host userbase (just in general, not >> specifically for docker deployments) so I don't think it's an >> unrealistic expectation that the Ansible docker module works out of >> the box. > > +1 I'd rather err on the side of satisfying user expectations +1 here. -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb redhat com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature