Re: [atomic-devel] Proposal for default qcow2 image virtual size 10G instead of 6G

[Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com>]

Not sure what you are trying to say?

Thanks
Vivek

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:59:08PM +0000, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> It's xfs so it will just expand.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, 7:51 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal redhat com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Virtual size of qcow2 f22 atomic size is 6G. I am wondering if there is
> > a reason behind such small size. Will 10G be a better default.
> >
> > Right now out of 6G, 3G is consumed by rootfs. We also setup thin pool
> > for docker which will consume 40% of free space (or 2G minimum). Some
> > people are finding that out of box, there is not enough space for thin
> > pool and 3G free space gets exhausted pretty fast.
> >
> > Is it a good idea to bump up default virtual size to 10G?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vivek
> >
> >