[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree
- From: Dusty Mabe <dusty dustymabe com>
- To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud lists fedoraproject org>
- Cc: rel-eng lists fedoraproject org, atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:31:11 -0400
On 08/25/2016 12:05 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 08/25/2016 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic.
>>
>> Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is
>> expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release?
>>
>
>
> Hey Peter,
>
> Thanks for the reply. It looks like the latest two week release [1] that was released
> yesterday shows this problem:
>
> -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status
> TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME REFSPEC
> * 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
>
> Honestly I have no idea where it is getting the wrong information from. I thought
> it was pointing at the old ref: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/atomic/24/refs/heads/fedora-atomic/f24/
> but that one is actually from 7/20:
>
> 2016-07-20 00:05:19 24.8 955a54ca5c fedora-atomic fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/f24/x86_64/docker-host
>
> So this iso is being build from a tree even older than that maybe it is pulling from
> some old koji internal location (from before f24 release?)
>
> Dusty
>
> [1] https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Atomic/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-dvd-x86_64-24-20160820.0.iso
Dennis has looked into this and opened up a PR that we think will fix
the issue:
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/69
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]