Re: [atomic-devel] Landing pages

The current swing at a Vagrant based doc is here:

https://github.com/nzwulfin/atomic-site/blob/vagrant/source/docs/vagrant_installation.md

Could we have two Quick Starts depending on if they're
familiar with Vagrant or not?

That's also another topic that came in the original discussion is how many X Guides at all levels to we need? Virtualbox vs Libvirt? Vagrant vs Adv Vagrant? Fedora vs Centos?

Here's the discussion that happened on IRC a billion Internet years ago:

https://gist.github.com/nzwulfin/022dc7438a8f43a999df

Open to comments and questions

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Lebon <jlebon redhat com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----

> I agree and am claiming responsibility here. We have an arguably better
> experience available currently for Fedora Atomic via Vagrant.

This is something that I've been trying to address with
Developer Mode as well, although I can see both of them
serving their purpose. E.g. Vagrant is much nicer if folks
are already set up for it, while Developer Mode is nice for
first timers who don't want that upfront investment of
setting up and learning Vagrant just to try out Atomic.

> So, excuses aside, I'll put together a new Super Quick Start Guide
> highlighting the vagrant builds that Dusty and Jason have worked hard on
> putting together.

Could we have two Quick Starts depending on if they're
familiar with Vagrant or not? Or would that be too confusing
to present?