Re: [atomic-devel] should /etc/os-release mention atomic?

[Daniel Riek <riek redhat com>]

FWIW: I think the logic on the RHEL side was that we don't want to make it look different - it's a different deployment format of the same OS...

D.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephen Milner <smilner redhat com> wrote:

On Jul 28, 2016 10:48 AM, "Waldemar Augustyn" <waldemar astyn com> wrote:
>
> It's a minor point but I wonder if /etc/os-release should mention atomic
> somewhere.  It's a different OS from centos/fedora listed now.  Right
> now I am checking rpm-ostree to tell atomic from standard centos/fedora.
>

Agreed. I believe that Jonathan Lebon is already working on adding it in.

--
Thanks,
Steve

--

Daniel Riek <riek redhat com>

* Sr. Director Systems Design & Engineering 

* Red Hat Inc, Tel. +1-617-863-6776