On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:22:30PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > > The RH patchset will be the same for both Fedora and RHEL, just that RHEL > > could have approaches (like docker and docker-latest) > > Fedora would never agree to. > > I think we *could* do this in Fedora...but a big question here is, do we *need* > to now? Ideally, and I guess I really do mean ideally, we'll get better with > having Kube work with newer docker more consistently. > > > I'd like to zero in on a single approach moving forward. > > > 2. RHEL rpms (docker + docker-latest) rebuilt (consider it a preview or > > something before official release) > > I think this. Or rather, think of it as the CentOS being upstream. > > (What is a huge pain point here is CentOS lacking dist-git making > collaboration difficult, but nothing really stops us from creating > a dist-git in projectatomic either) We do use https://github.com/CentOS-virt7 for dist-gits atm. I guess the xen and ovirt folks use it really well, though I'm guilty of not keeping it in sync with the srpms built, mostly because all that CBS needs is an srpm. -- Lokesh Freenode: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature