[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release Delayed - Feedback Requested
- From: Charlie Drage <cdrage redhat com>
- To: Jason Brooks <jbrooks redhat com>
- Cc: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud lists fedoraproject org>, "atomic-devel projectatomic io" <atomic-devel projectatomic io>, Adam Miller <maxamillion fedoraproject org>
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release Delayed - Feedback Requested
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:30:25 -0400
Ahhhhhh, that explains why Atomic was missing from:
https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/index.html this morning.
On 06/21, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Adam Miller
> <maxamillion fedoraproject org> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > The original schedule for today's Fedora Two-Week Atomic Release
> > was going to include a cut-over of our back end Release Infrastructure
> > and AutoCloud automated QA environment to be compose based (one of the
> > building blocks we need in place to make the future of the release
> > process more flexible). However, because of the most recent Fedora 24
> > release slip this has caused a conflict of schedules (a schedule that
> > was agreed upon at the Cloud FAD a few weeks ago) and as a side effect
> > of the Fedora 24 GA event we are currently in a Fedora Infrastructure
> > Freeze. During this Freeze, we can not make the back end changes
> > needed to cut over to the new versions of the RelEng Composer and
> > AutoCloud which are currently hosting the Fedora 24 Atomic Images.
> >
> > This is something that slipped through the cracks and ultimately lands
> > on me, and for that I would like to apologize to members of Project
> > Atomic, Fedora Cloud WG, and both project communities at large.
> >
> > That being said, we have a couple of options on how to handle this and
> > I would like to request feedback from others.
> >
> > We can slip the Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release by 1 week just
> > as the Fedora 24 GA Release was slipped and target next Tuesday
> > (2016-06-21). This would "reset the clock" on the Two Week Releases
> > and we will then have a Two-Week Release every two weeks following
> > that one.
>
> I vote for this option, slip a week, reset the clock.
>
> Jason
>
> >
> > Or
> >
> > We can skip this Two-Week Atomic Release all together and target the
> > next Two-Week Atomic Release scheduled date of Tuesday 2016-07-05.
> >
> > Or
> >
> > We can release a Fedora 23 Based Two-Week Atomic image today (or
> > tomorrow, pending how fast feedback rolls in) and target the next
> > Two-Week Release window as the time to cut over to Fedora 24.
> >
> > I'm open to alternate suggestions but do note that aspects of the Two
> > Week release process are limiting at present, which is something this
> > new Infrastructure deployment will be the starting point to resolve,
> > so there may be restrictions on how creative of a solution we can come
> > up with in the near term.
> >
> > Once again, I would like to apologize to all who have been impacted by
> > this and we hope that with the planned changes to the Infrastructure
> > and the Release code will allow for more flexibility in the future.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > -AdamM
> >
>
--
Charlie Drage
Red Hat - OSAS Team / Project Atomic
4096R / 0x9B3B446C
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x622CDF119B3B446C
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]