[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Who can Slack?
- From: Jason Brooks <jbrooks redhat com>
- To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Who can Slack?
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Garrison" <justin garrison disneyanimation com>
> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:07:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Who can Slack?
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, <atomic-devel-request projectatomic io>
> wrote:
>
> > Do you think kubernetes would give us a channel? Frankly, we don't need
> > more than one.
> >
>
> You can sign up for a SIG which gets an email list (not that another is
> needed) and a channel.
>
>
> https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/wiki/Special-Interest-Groups-(SIGs)
>
>
> I think it'd be a good alternative unless (as bex pointed out) there will
> be a desire to have separation from k8s or multiple channels for -users,
> -devel, fedora, centos, atomic-cli, etc.
This sounds pretty good -- it could be a good way to loop into the wider
kube community
>
>
> -- Justin
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]