Re: [atomic-devel] ARM builds?

[Jon Stanley <jonstanley gmail com>]

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Josh Berkus <jberkus redhat com> wrote:

> Thing is, each of these stages is useful on its own.  And if we can get
> 1 & 2 going, I think that additional community help will show up.

100% agreed, and I think that this order of things makes a ton of
sense, and agree that they're each indepedently useful. That said, I
think that Fedora would be the first (and easiest) to get working,
unless there's something that I'm not seeing here (which is possible)