On 15.01.2017 22:03, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > I noticed today when comparing two trees, one from Dec25 and the > latest one, that the version of cockpit went backwards. > > !cockpit-bridge-126-1.fc25.x86_64 > =cockpit-bridge-120-1.fc25.x86_64 > !cockpit-docker-126-1.fc25.x86_64 > =cockpit-docker-120-1.fc25.x86_64 > !cockpit-networkmanager-126-1.fc25.noarch > =cockpit-networkmanager-120-1.fc25.noarch > !cockpit-ostree-126-1.fc25.x86_64 > =cockpit-ostree-120-1.fc25.x86_64 > !cockpit-shell-126-1.fc25.noarch > =cockpit-shell-120-1.fc25.noarch > > This is actually because cockpit changed cockpit-shell to cockpit-system [1] > but we are explicitly including cockpit-shell in our manifest > [2]. This means that the only version it could find that had > cockpit-networkmanager and cockpit-shell was the one from fedora 25 > release (not updates). > > I'll open an issue to try to come up with ideas on how to prevent this > type of thing from happening in the future without going noticed. > > Dusty > > [1] https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/commit/e13e193ec19708f6488c32be02f95d782dfd1e22 > [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/blob/f25/f/fedora-atomic-docker-host.json#_108-112 Indeed. We'll be releasing Cockpit 129 shortly, which will include an Obsoletes directive in the RPM and should fix this issue. Sorry for the breakage. Stef
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature