Re: [atomic-devel] Thinking about CRI-O and Docker on Atomic Host

[Clayton Coleman <ccoleman redhat com>]

oc cluster up will likely continue to use docker for the near future.

> On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:59 AM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:
>
> I've seen some interesting work on CRI-O for Kube/OpenShift.  But
> I'm wondering about what people are thinking the future of
> docker.service and /usr/bin/docker is (particularly for Atomic Host).
>
> The particular intersection with AH is handling container storage;
> AIUI right now you can't have CRI-O and Docker share the same
> storage pool.
>
> So...should a CRI-O installer `systemctl stop docker.service; systemctl mask docker.service`
> and reuse the partition we've set up for /var/lib/docker?  Or do we
> expect people to set up a separate partition?
> (It feels like the answer is probably "both")
>
> Perhaps in the big picture for the single-node case we point people
> at `oc cluster up` etc?  (Which itself should be a system container probably
> to avoid the obvious bootstrapping problem?)
>