Re: [atomic-devel] Porting to GRUB2

[Dusty Mabe <dustymabe gmail com>]

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:28:58AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014, at 10:26 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:41:44PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > The Anaconda patches are unlikely to make Fedora 21's Anaconda, so what
> > > I'm further proposing is that we target work on CentOS Atomic SIG +
> > > Fedora rawhide.  If we want to still ship something for F21, we could
> > > carry a custom Anaconda.
> > 
> > It's _way_ too late to be making F21 changes of this magnitude. We _do_
> > want to ship something, though. Is this change urgent? Can't we just do
> > this in rawhide but ship Fedora 21 Atomic with extlinux? Stabilization
> > without slowing down development is why we branch from rawhide for
> > releases, after all.
> 
> Right, I was hasty - I think we can still ship a cloud image for F21
> using extlinux.

Does this have any implications for future users when they are running
F21-atom (extlinux) and then want to rebase onto F22-atom (grub2)?

Dusty