[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] [CentOS-devel] CentOS Atomic SIG weekly meetings: Tuesdays in #atomic at 14:30 UTC
- From: Karsten Wade <kwade redhat com>
- To: Haïkel <hguemar fedoraproject org>
- Cc: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel centos org>, atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] [CentOS-devel] CentOS Atomic SIG weekly meetings: Tuesdays in #atomic at 14:30 UTC
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:34:24 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/2014 01:22 AM, Haïkel wrote:
> HI Karsten,
>
> we should try before meetings but it will probably conflict at
> least when using the #topic command In Fedora, all meetings reports
> are CC'ed to a list called meetingminutes, maybe we could do the
> same with CentOS ?
Haïkel,
I think it would only conflict if both bots had chanops, they would
step on each other rewriting the topic (and maybe just one would win
out randomly by server response time.)
But yes, let's test. :) Looks like centbot is in there ... and my test
seems to have worked, they both logged:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2014-09-22/atomic.2014-09-22-18.26.html
Note that the zodbot minutes are a side effect of having the meeting
in the upstream channel, there really isn't an intention to have a
CentOS SIG minutes in the Fedora Project tracker.
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlQga7AACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEFuHwCg1hLXd8UF+/G55FDZUtIND1rL
R1QAnRowtW98z6U1v5Aw0N4SyguOpUnT
=ENQo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]