[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Version 2 of the atomic-site documentation
- From: Jason Brooks <jbrooks redhat com>
- To: Matt Micene <nzwulfin gmail com>
- Cc: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Version 2 of the atomic-site documentation
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:43:00 -0500 (EST)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Micene" <nzwulfin gmail com>
> To: jzb redhat com
> Cc: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 12:19:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Version 2 of the atomic-site documentation
>
> Joe,
>
> I'll hold off for now then and maybe send you what I have currently for
> review, it's a fairly big change from the existing getting started (but not
> as far as I want to go).
Is this it:
https://github.com/nzwulfin/atomic-site/commit/06e3eebaadb40aefcc42bba66da205dbf66801e8
On first look, this seems pretty good.
Jason
>
> -Matt M
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb redhat com> wrote:
>
> > On 01/26/2015 11:30 PM, Matt Micene wrote:
> > > Should I continue to work on these changes in the v2 branch? Is there a
> > > redesign plan somewhere for v2?
> >
> > Apologies for the delayed response. For now, we can continue in master,
> > and I'll try to put out a (new) redesign plan folks can work on towards
> > Fedora 22 and CentOS Atomic Host as it stabilizes. Probably in about two
> > weeks after I get back from FOSEM/DevConf.cz.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > jzb
> > --
> > Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
> > jzb redhat com | http://community.redhat.com/
> > Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
> >
> >
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]