Re: [atomic-devel] Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers

[Dusty Mabe <dusty dustymabe com>]

On 11/12/2015 05:17 PM, Michael McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Amanda Carter <acarter redhat com> wrote:
> > Adding the list. Both questions still open.
> IMHO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276775 is a blocker
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278984 not a blocker if
> it can be fixed by the next 2 week release.  I'm willing to hear
> arguments on this one but I don't know that contacting docker from
> within a docker container is a common use case (I know openshift does
> this for builds but I don't think many are running openshift on atomic
> host today).

One other use case that takes advantage of this is Atoimcapp/Nulecule. 
I'm not saying it is a large enough audience at this point to prevent 
release, but just saying that it exists.

Dusty