Re: [atomic-devel] Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers

[Dusty Mabe <dusty dustymabe com>]

On 11/12/2015 05:37 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> On 11/12/2015 05:17 PM, Michael McGrath wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Amanda Carter <acarter redhat com> 
> > wrote:
> > > Adding the list. Both questions still open.
> > IMHO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276775 is a blocker
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278984 not a blocker if
> > it can be fixed by the next 2 week release.  I'm willing to hear
> > arguments on this one but I don't know that contacting docker from
> > within a docker container is a common use case (I know openshift does
> > this for builds but I don't think many are running openshift on atomic
> > host today).
>
> One other use case that takes advantage of this is Atoimcapp/Nulecule. 
> I'm not saying it is a large enough audience at this point to prevent 
> release, but just saying that it exists.

BZ 1275593 is pretty much a dup of 1276775 and more people have 
reporting things that are broken there (i.e. cockpit is broken, etc). 
See comments:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275593