Re: [atomic-devel] Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers

[Michael McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com>]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Dusty Mabe <dusty dustymabe com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/2015 04:47 PM, Amanda Carter wrote:
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>
>>> From: "Amanda Carter" <acarter redhat com>
>>> To: "Michael McGrath" <mmcgrath redhat com>
>>> Cc: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm redhat com>, atomic-devel projectatomic io,
>>> "Colin Walters" <walters redhat com>, "Dusty
>>> Mabe" <dmabe redhat com>, "Adam Miller" <admiller redhat com>
>>> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:22:41 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>
>>>> From: "Michael McGrath" <mmcgrath redhat com>
>>>> To: "Amanda Carter" <acarter redhat com>
>>>> Cc: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm redhat com>, atomic-devel projectatomic io,
>>>> "Colin Walters" <walters redhat com>, "Dusty
>>>> Mabe" <dmabe redhat com>, "Adam Miller" <admiller redhat com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 5:17:40 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Potential Atomic 2 Week Release blockers
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Amanda Carter <acarter redhat com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Adding the list. Both questions still open.
>>>>>
>>>> IMHO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276775 is a blocker
>>>
>>> OK, any thoughts on how this should be gated going forward? Do we expect
>>> a
>>> person to monitor this or do we need a mechanism for folks to
>>
>> Following up on this thread to let everyone know what we've worked out
>> here. The first release for Atomic was not shipped due to this blocker.
>> Going forward, Mike McGrath will be taking ownership of reviewing this
>> backlog every 2 weeks to make sure someone is working blockers to resolution
>> prior to our release window. Jen Krieger will be helping him to execute
>> that. Adam has put a mechanism [1] in place to allow Mike to mark a release
>> as bad if there are any blockers.
>>
>> I expect the process to look something like this...
>>
>> * A week before the 2 week release (next one is Dec 1), Jen schedules a
>> review that Mike leads
>
>
> Can this be a publicly announced meeting? Can be regularly scheduled so that
> we can add it to a calendar [1] and promote it so that hopefully other
> people will take interest?
>
> [1] - https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/
>

Unfortunately probably not only because instead of adding a new
meeting to all of the teams involved (there are a few) we're going to
re-purpose some time in the existing meetings.  I'm open to ideas on
making this more public, but we try to avoid scheduling additional
meetings for people because of how much of a time sink they can be.

-- 
Mike McGrath | mmcgrath redhat com | (312) 660-3547
Atomic | Red Hat Chicago | http://projectatomic.io/