[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] Quorum-based voting for system upgrade
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Quorum-based voting for system upgrade
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:58:29 -0400
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015, at 05:53 AM, Natale Vinto wrote:
>
> This let containers hosts being updated silently by pushing the update
> remotely (solicitate an upgrade) and perform a reboot based some
> strategies, where the most useful is the one that let the cluster of
> hosts decide itself what system to reboot, thanks to a lock in the
> etcd distribuited key-value store, that ensure rebooting only not busy
> container hosts.
We recently landed a "daemon" mode for rpm-ostree which should
help implement higher-level logic around host updates. I'd like
to integrate a default "timer" option soon.
That said, what I think we really want here is for Kubernetes
to be in charge of scheduling host updates. It could
move pods *before* rebooting a host to ensure that there's
no downtime.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]