[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [atomic-devel] We need to combine our patches for each version of docker.

From: Antonio Murdaca <amurdaca redhat com>
To: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
Cc: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5 redhat com>, runcom redhat com, "atomic-devel projectatomic io" <atomic-devel projectatomic io>
Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] We need to combine our patches for each version of docker.
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:39:17 +0200

Makes sense. I only fear the time docker will need something RHEL specific (as it's happening now with 1.9) but I guess we'll branch out when things will differ.
Right now I've created two now branches tracking 1.12 docker development but I'll remove them and just create one which will be used for both RHEL and Fedora.

On Apr 25, 2016 10:00 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh redhat com> wrote:

Since we are shipping the same docker patches in RHEL/Fedora/Centos we need to stop carrying rhel-1.10 versus Fedora-1.10.

So lets just create patch sets based on version. 1.10 1.11 1.12 ...

Then build RHEL/Centos and Fedora versions off of same pool. We are hearing complaints from Kubernetes/OpenShift about having features in RHEL docker-1.9 that are not in Fedora-23 version.

So we need to better align these, and this will hopefully make our lives easier going forward.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [atomic-devel] We need to combine our patches for each version of docker.
  - From: Daniel J Walsh

References:
- [atomic-devel] We need to combine our patches for each version of docker.
  - From: Daniel J Walsh

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]