Re: [atomic-devel] projectatomic kubernetes container images

[Jason Brooks <jbrooks redhat com>]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 04:25 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/22/2016 02:59 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>>> I'd like to start a projectatomic repo for fedora/centos kube
>>>> dockerfiles, and I'd like to build them under the projectatomic docker
>>>> hub namespace.
>>>>
>>>> This is my test repo: https://github.com/jasonbrooks/k8s-images. I
>>>> have branches for centos and for f25, and I've built docker images
>>>> associated with these in my dockerhub namespace:
>>>> https://hub.docker.com/r/jasonbrooks/.
>>>>
>>>> These docker files are based on the ones in CentOS-Dockerfiles,
>>>> (https://github.com/CentOS/CentOS-Dockerfiles/tree/master/kubernetes).
>>>> Fedora-dockerfiles is sort of in flux right now, so it seems that
>>>> projectatomic ought to be a good place to collab on these / build /
>>>> distribute these.
>>>>
>>>> The fedora versions of the files are pulling kube 1.4.5 from
>>>> updates-testing. The centos versions are pulling an el7 build of those
>>>> same packages from my copr
>>>> (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jasonbrooks/kubernetes/). I'm
>>>> going to work on getting these into the centos build system.
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>> Are these system containers?  We currently have a repo for these type of
>>> Dockerfiles.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-system-containers
>> These are regular containers at this point
> Interesting question of whether some of them should be.  I think we
> should look at combining them into this
> containers pool and perhaps renaming them to just system-containers or
> containers.  Rather then just
> throwing more repos all over Atomic.  The current goals with system
> containers is to be able to run apps
> on an atomic host.  These apps usually extend the host system.  For
> example we want to be able to remove
> etcd, flanneld, docker and k8s from atomic host and have them only run
> in containers.  Since we want
> well defined ordering we want to let systemd control the setup of these
> containers.  They use runc out of
> a systemd unit file.   Some of  your containers could probably be
> extended to do the same thing rather then
> just running them as docker containers.  But the framework should be
> able to support running these containers
> in either way.

That works for me. I'll send a pr