Re: [atomic-devel] How to handle crashes

[Jakub Filak <jfilak redhat com>]

I've asked node-problem-detector upstream for help on engaging ABRT in
node-problem-detector:
https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/issues/35


On 10/21/2016 09:35 AM, Jakub Filak wrote:
> I've created a Docker file that produces an image with ABRT configured to
> detect Kernel oopses in systemd-journal, vmcores on host and registers
> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern to detect core files:
> https://github.com/jfilak/docker-abrt/tree/atomic_minimal
> 
> Detecting those problems is not a rocket science. However, with ABRT
> employed you don't need to take care about this part and you can focus on
> propagation of events to appropriate destinations.
> 
> Dominika, how can we teach ABRT to report the detected problems to
> NodeProblemDetector?
> 
> Is there a command that ABRT can execute or should we connect to a TCP port?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Jakub
> 
> 
> On 09/15/2016 02:34 AM, Derek Carr wrote:
>> Dominika has been looking into node problem detector on our team, the issue
>> we have found is while we like how it can report NodeConditions back into
>> cluster state, it's current kernel monitoring support is insufficient
>> until https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/issues/14
>>
>> It would be neat if we can plug something more intelligent into the current
>> framework that could do more.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Jeremy Eder <jeder redhat com
>> <mailto:jeder redhat com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Anyone know?  There's a node-problem-detector proposed in Kubernetes but
>>     ... abrt is far more comprehensive.
>>     https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector
>>     <https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector>
>>
>>     The difference is that node-problem-detector has hooks to call back to
>>     the kubernetes control plane to inform it that a node has problems.
>>     We could create an abrt container that does the same for RH-based ecosystem.
>>
>>     On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Jeremy Eder <jeder redhat com
>>     <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jeder redhat com');>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hmm, appears this was not integrated into Fedora Atomic?  Is there a
>>         plan to do so?
>>
>>         On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Jakub Filak <jfilak redhat com
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jfilak redhat com');>> wrote:
>>
>>             __
>>
>>             Hello,
>>
>>              
>>
>>             I've been working on integration of ABRT with Project Atomic
>>             and, today, my work landed in Fedora 22 [1].
>>
>>              
>>
>>             To enable abrt core_dump helper on Atomic hosts, it is necessary
>>             to install abrt-atomic package and enable abrt-coredump-helper
>>             service. After doing so core dump files will be stored in
>>             sub-directories of /var/tmp/abrt/.
>>
>>              
>>
>>             You can find more technical details here:
>>
>>             https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/Containers-and-chroots#abrt---project-atomic
>>             <https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/Containers-and-chroots#abrt---project-atomic>
>>
>>              
>>
>>              
>>
>>             Should I write a new proposal for the oversight repository or
>>             should I just open a new pull request for fedora-atomic repository?
>>
>>              
>>
>>              
>>
>>              
>>
>>             Regards,
>>
>>             Jakub
>>
>>              
>>
>>              
>>
>>             1:
>>             https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-abrt-1.1.0-1.fc22,abrt-2.5.0-2.fc22,libreport-2.5.0-1.fc22
>>             <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-abrt-1.1.0-1.fc22,abrt-2.5.0-2.fc22,libreport-2.5.0-1.fc22>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         -- 
>>
>>         -- Jeremy Eder
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>     -- Jeremy Eder
>>
>