I've asked node-problem-detector upstream for help on engaging ABRT in
node-problem-detector:
https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/issues/ 35
On 10/21/2016 09:35 AM, Jakub Filak wrote:
> I've created a Docker file that produces an image with ABRT configured to
> detect Kernel oopses in systemd-journal, vmcores on host and registers
> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern to detect core files:
> https://github.com/jfilak/docker-abrt/tree/atomic_ minimal
>
> Detecting those problems is not a rocket science. However, with ABRT
> employed you don't need to take care about this part and you can focus on
> propagation of events to appropriate destinations.
>
> Dominika, how can we teach ABRT to report the detected problems to
> NodeProblemDetector?
>
> Is there a command that ABRT can execute or should we connect to a TCP port?
>
>
> Regards,
> Jakub
>
>
> On 09/15/2016 02:34 AM, Derek Carr wrote:
>> Dominika has been looking into node problem detector on our team, the issue
>> we have found is while we like how it can report NodeConditions back into
>> cluster state, it's current kernel monitoring support is insufficient
>> until https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/issues/ 14
>>
>> It would be neat if we can plug something more intelligent into the current
>> framework that could do more.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Jeremy Eder <jeder redhat com
>> <mailto:jeder redhat com>> wrote:
>>
>> Anyone know? There's a node-problem-detector proposed in Kubernetes but
>> ... abrt is far more comprehensive.
>> https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector
>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem- >detector
>>
>> The difference is that node-problem-detector has hooks to call back to
>> the kubernetes control plane to inform it that a node has problems.
>> We could create an abrt container that does the same for RH-based ecosystem.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Jeremy Eder <jeder redhat com
>> <_javascript_:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jeder redhat com ');>> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, appears this was not integrated into Fedora Atomic? Is there a
>> plan to do so?
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Jakub Filak <jfilak redhat com
>> <_javascript_:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jfilak redhat com ');>> wrote:
>>
>> __
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I've been working on integration of ABRT with Project Atomic
>> and, today, my work landed in Fedora 22 [1].
>>
>>
>>
>> To enable abrt core_dump helper on Atomic hosts, it is necessary
>> to install abrt-atomic package and enable abrt-coredump-helper
>> service. After doing so core dump files will be stored in
>> sub-directories of /var/tmp/abrt/.
>>
>>
>>
>> You can find more technical details here:
>>
>> https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/Containers-and-chroots# abrt---project-atomic
>> <https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/Containers-and-chroots# >abrt---project-atomic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Should I write a new proposal for the oversight repository or
>> should I just open a new pull request for fedora-atomic repository?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jakub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-abrt-1.1.0- 1.fc22,abrt-2.5.0-2.fc22, libreport-2.5.0-1.fc22
>> <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-abrt-1.1.0- >1.fc22,abrt-2.5.0-2.fc22, libreport-2.5.0-1.fc22
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> -- Jeremy Eder
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> -- Jeremy Eder
>>
>