[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [atomic-devel] Docker project: Can you have overlay2 speed and density with devicemapper? Yep.

*What* do you intend to surface to users? IIUC, this discussion is specific to device mapper storage drivers right?

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Jeremy Eder <jeder redhat com> wrote:

Vivek Goyal (cc) and I were discussing ways to deliver page cache sharing, POSIX compliance and SELinux support with a single docker graph driver, using existing kernel facilities.  We decided to go with a bind-mount technique, and Vivek has posted a first cut here:  https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/27364

Testing of the prototype looks like a great improvement:

Assuming this type of feature is merged in a container run-time, what preference would Kube folks have for surfacing this to users ... currently it's a daemon runtime flag that says ... if you use --read-only then you get the shared-rootfs as well.  Obviously this requires "12factor-ish" design up front, because you can no longer scribble in the container filesystem in places that are not persistent volumes, but we think read-only container hygiene is well worth the security and performance improvements to be had.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-dev googlegroups com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kubernetes-dev/CABxNGQa-VLzP%3DEFYQucfJtTEtSHmWac4Tv%3Dc%2BQVAFJNcDLSb1g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]