[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] We have a bugzilla requesting that we change the default CMD to systemd for base images in RHEL
- From: Jan Pazdziora <jpazdziora redhat com>
- To: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
- Cc: "atomic-devel projectatomic io" <atomic-devel projectatomic io>
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] We have a bugzilla requesting that we change the default CMD to systemd for base images in RHEL
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:05:01 +0100
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:58:21AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> I think the systemd guys would argue that there is no processes running
> other then those that you need. Removing
> some of these could cause other services to break. If you enable a
> service that is only run as multi-user.target then
> it will not start if you remove a target.
>
> Update-done.service and dnf-makecache, probably should be removed.
>
> But I guess what is the cost of running versus removing them?
The cost is the wasted cycles upon each container start.
> How would they be maintained.
I'd suggest going with some special default target like container.target
instead of multi-user.target, and just putting things that are really
necessary for the typical systemd-based scenario like running
httpd.service
in the container.
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]