[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [atomic-devel] System container images in projectatomic docker hub
- From: Jerry Zhang <jerzhang redhat com>
- To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
- Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] System container images in projectatomic docker hub
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:37:25 -0500 (EST)
There's 2 parts to the answer, the container *image* itself in the upstream
repo is built off fedora. But I believe there are rhel/centos based images
in the RH registry.
The containers are host-specific, but for etcd and flannel, I've tested
them to work on fedora/centos/rhel and atomic host variants. Docker
is split into fedora and centos host specific versions, but those are
not fully working/tested at this time.
Hope that helps!
Thanks,
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott McCarty" <smccarty redhat com>
> To: atomic-devel projectatomic io
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 8:59:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] System container images in projectatomic docker hub
>
> Dumb question. Are these CentOS/Fedora images? Not RHEL right?
>
>
> On 01/12/2017 08:44 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:32:41PM -0800, Jason Brooks wrote:
> >> I think it would be worth getting these into fedora's layered build
> >> system, too.
> > +1000!
> >
> > Then, they'll end up at the registry Randy Barlow is working on, and
> > also pushed to Docker Hub as part of that process.
> >
>
> --
>
> Scott McCarty, RHCA
>
> Technical Product Marketing: Containers
>
> Email: smccarty redhat com
>
> Phone: 312-660-3535
>
> Cell: 330-807-1043
>
> Web: http://crunchtools.com
>
> When should you split your application into multiple containers?
> http://red.ht/22xKw9i
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]